Sunday, October 22, 2006

I'm an educrat

Last week I submitted an opinion essay to Edspresso.com's Featured Commentary section. In the essay I discussed my feeling that despite NCLB's well intended goals of bettering the education system, there exists a flawed approach to implementation. The purpose of the essay was not to detail every little flaw in NCLB, but instead, to simply call for a change in execution, to hope that NCLB's one size fits all approach would be recognized for the ultimate failure it will be. Rightwingprof, from Right Wing Nation, felt that I was too vague, that my thinking was fuzzy, and that my anectdote was irrelevant. He also called me an educrat--see definition here.

What this self-proclaimed "grumpy old coot" said about me really upset me. He can dislike my anectdote--though I think it works well to lead into the topic without giving too much away too soon--and he can fail to recognize that the purpose of the essay was not to pick apart NCLB--but he cannot get away with calling me an educrat, a word that has "An officer, administrator or other bureaucrat in a school district" as a definition.
Believe me, I am far from the bureaucracy. The definition goes on to describe the educrat as, "pinheads who are so process-oriented that they are more excited in the process of learning than the myriad wonders that can be learned." Again, this does not describe me very well. I am results based, something that a NCLB advocate should pee his pants in excitement over.
But the statement that prompted an entire post for a response is this one: "And we have to clean up your mess when your students who know next to nothing and think their "feelings" are as valid as real-world data get into our classes" (rightwingprof).
I had been giving rightwingprof the benefit of the doubt in terms of his own credibility. Before I began teaching the Pre-College English class for 12th graders interested in college, I attended a local community college's English Dept. meeting to ask for their expectations of incoming freshmen--so I am confident that I am less concerned with their "feelings" and more focused on their "real world data."
Now, what I want you the reader to understand from this post is that while many critics of public education will regularly claim that we, the teachers, are more concerned about warm fuzzies and blaming other people, it is those same critics who fail to live, breath, and have their being in the classroom. Whenever a critic tosses around rhetoric, and fails to discuss the entire issue, whether that critic be a right-winged whacko or left-leaning loon, we ought to have the courage to provide the truth.
So, for the rightwingprof, here is one example of a flaw in NCLB. Let's say that a school makes gains in the area of Language Arts. The school's overall passing rate for Reading rises from 77% to 81%. And, let's say that the ethnic groups' scores rise, the limited English proficiency scores go up, and the special needs students' scores go up. But, the sub-group of students from low income homes scores stay static. This one sub-group's lack of test score gains can put a school's Adequate Yearly Progress in jeopardy. This is a flaw.
A second flaw of NCLB is that it does not take into consideration a statistical cohort group. Progress must be made every year until 100% of students by 2014 are proficient. Which is a third flaw. Now, I run the risk of being misquoted or taken out of context, but I am willing to take the risk.
The notion that NCLB, a law that is intended as comprehensive school reform, fails to acknowledge that parents and students are also culpable in the improvement of education, is the single greates flaw. If parents don't value education and subsequently the student doesn't value education, there is little I can do to help that student succeed. This does not mean that teachers do not still have an obligation to use effective methods and maintain high standards. But truthfully, and from experience in the classroom, sometimes the best we can do with certain kids is to get them to class more often than not.
And if someone outside of the classroom, whose only data comes from government reports or other fishbowl observations, wants to challenge the effectiveness of a school or teacher, I dare them to put down their research journals, enroll in their Education School of choice, and do a better job.

7 Comments:

At 8:15 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wholeheartedly agree! I always found it ironic that my education professors were among the poorest teachers. You would think that those teaching teachers how to be teachers would be able to lead by example.

 
At 1:35 PM , Anonymous MellowOut said...

What I don't understand is why, when people read something they don't like or don't agree with, they immediately start with the personal attacks and name-calling. We have become a nation of extremes. Either you're promoting a zombie-filled classroom because of rote-memorization practices or you're off in Neverland writing poetry about the number six's curves instead of learning the six-times tables.

We're bringing the nastiness of policitcal rhetoric and bickering to the world of education. These tactics are not about creating well-informed arguments or much-needed debate and reform. They're about proving the other side wrong at all costs. It is easier to throw out a derogatory term rather than explain why your logic is fuzzy.

I love reading opinions and views that are different than mine. I honestly feel it's important to do so with an open mind, if you pardon the cliche. In fact, reading some of RightWingProf's own posts and ones on similar pages have made me rethink my stance on a few issues. But then we have to start slinging mud at each other, and people on both sides start to lose credibility, which is why I stopped reading many self-professed right- and left-wing political blogs.

 
At 6:53 PM , Anonymous Dana Huff said...

I have some thoughts, but don't really want to post them publicly, and I don't see e-mail contact information for you here. If you are interested, drop me an e-mail.

 
At 4:43 PM , Blogger Kimberly Moritz said...

Why would anyone think a personal assault is okay? Teachers don't do this in person, within a school system. Is it because of the lack of face to face? Personal attacks reflect poorly only on the attacker, not on the target. Hmmm, sounds like bullying. And what purpose does any of it serve? Disagree thoughtfully and politely, we have to model it. Sorry you were a target just for sharing your thoughts.

 
At 1:11 PM , Blogger Cece said...

My impression is that very few teachers are educrats, no matter how high their position. Teachers want to teach, teachers want their pupils and students to learn. But they are crippled by the methods mandated by the educrats, who have no idea how to teach anyone anything. Educrats believe that the latest (unproven) method is the greatest and that the old ways must be abandoned immediately. As a result, kids are learning less and less, and it's been going on so long that many teachers don't know the material they are supposed to teach -- for example, how many teachers can read easily using phonics?

 
At 3:22 AM , Anonymous Fekla said...

Only smart university students can emphasize the differences between all kind of formats of written tasks at every semester they study in. They prefer best writing companies able to make observations of modern life actions and point out particularities that would become crucial for serious Papersmart original essays for sale full of creative thinking as well as critical reflections. It has to be a really good help given on time at the right place.

 
At 11:33 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

壯陽藥 樂威壯 樂威壯 壯陽藥 樂威壯怎麼使用才正確 樂威壯 壯陽藥 壯陽藥品 樂威壯levitra levitra樂威壯 樂威壯哪裡買 樂威壯哪裡買 威而鋼 壯陽藥 樂威壯
樂威壯
春藥 早洩治療 壯陽藥

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home