Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Here is your certificate, now the parents own you.

One of the drawbacks to teaching, and unlike some teachers I don't find too many, is that upon receiving a contract we suddenly find ourselves scrutinized by more people than I am comfortable with. Our students watch us; our peers watch us; our administration watches us; our district personnel watch us; the parents watch us. The government even watches us.
The difficulty for me is that it means I am always on stage. The opportunity to be human goes out the door. If one of the many people watching you finds they don't like something about you, life can become quite difficult.
Over at Right on the Left Coast a fellow teacher is under attack, by an irate parent, for his commentary on an act of protest. His follow-up post receives quite a few comments. In looking back at the frenzy I created a few months back with a post about a tradition at my school (I removed the original post and replaced it with an apology--though I DID NOT HAVE TO), I must consider what, if anything, we lose as individuals when we become teachers.
Clearly there is a code of professional behavior, but does that code mean we must lose our right, away from the school to live within the bounds of the law. It is one thing if a teacher is violating a law, of course we should face up to the penalties that our laws state. But if a teacher feels the need to write, on his blog, about a social movement or anything else, does the employing school or a parent, have any right to censor that speech?
A perception lingers, perhaps from an age when teaching was done in a one room school-house, that teachers are somehow the embodiment of what the community values. But clearly this is an unattainable goal in modern society. My values as a teacher are potentially far different from that of the community I teach in. Perhaps I am too conservative or too liberal. Too youthful or too old fashioned. We should have the right, just as anybody else in this world, to have opinions and share them.
One of the people I respect the most in my life is a boss from a hotel I worked at. He is African-American and lived in the heart of Texas during a time of great prejudice and hate. I asked him once what it was like to experience injustice and hateful put-downs. How could he tolerate the beliefs of those people and not want to be the same way back. His response forever shaped the way I approach people with different values than me. He said, "You know what, people can believe any way they want. They have that right. They can say what they want, because they have that right. It doesn't mean they are right, only they have the right. "
Frankly, I am tired of living in a world where we cannot speak if it doesn't match-up with what others are looking for. It doesn't matter to me whether you are religious or not, politically to the right or to the left; we need to be able to have a voice of affirmation or dissent.
As teachers, we should be a representation of the world around us. Our administrators and central offices should not expect mindless lemmings. Our students and parents should not expect us to be the same as them. There is much more to education than algorithms, timelines, chemical equations, and iambic pentameter. There is something to be said about learning how to accept others while disagreeing with them. There is something to be said about evaluating one's personal beliefs through honest and open discourse.
If we are constantly looking to do battle over the inconsequential differences, we will never find a way to compromise on the issues that do matter.
_________________________________________________
Please go visit the Carnival of Education--Every Wednesday!

5 Comments:

At 7:39 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very eloquent post. But remember, you're defending a guy for linking to boobies on the internet. As of this moment I'm officially ready for summer to be over and to get back to teaching.

--Bucky
a Brown Bag Blog

 
At 6:20 AM , Anonymous Rhymes With Right said...

Bucky -- there are boobies and then there are boobies. I think that we may want to consider a little bit of context here, sort of the way one of the Supreme Court justices in the 1960s & 70s (I think it was Byron White) did in his statement "I know it when I see it."

It would be one thing if we were talking about links to "www.greatbigfreakinknockers.com". It would be an entirely different thing if we were talking about a site on human development, breast cancer, or Stone Age tribes of the Amazon basin.

In the case with Darren, we are talking about a guy who linked to a site talking about a recent political protest in whicha group of (particularly homely) women stripped off theri tops as a form of political protest. There was nothing sexual, nothing designed to arrouse a prurient interest (those women kept me from thinking about sex for at least 24 hours) in the photos. Where's the problem?

Your attitude, which minimizes the importance of free speech for teachers, is as disturbing as that of the censorious busybody who raised a stink over at Right n the Left Coast.

 
At 11:21 AM , Blogger Amerloc said...

"There is much more to education than algorithms, timelines, chemical equations, and iambic pentameter."

Amen. Except the iambic pentameter part.

 
At 3:11 PM , Blogger Polski3 said...

Perhaps Darren needs a blog in cognito. One of the fun things about the internet is one can be ANYONE or ANYTHING they wish, real identies need not be reveled.

AFAIK, the young person who began this witch hunt against Darren is not a student of his and does not attend the school where Darren teachs. IMO, this mom should be looking more closely at what her son is doing with the computer. And, she should realize, there are ALOT worse things her son could have found online.

In some cases, Free Speech is NOT the only 'right' some teachers lose when they become teachers. IMO, "firing" a new, non-tenured teacher without reason robs that teacher of their due process 'rights.' IMO, that is one of the major flaws in California's inititive regarding teacher tenure; if a tenured teacher 'gets' two bad evaluations, they can be fired. What is a "Bad" evaluation? What responsibility/duty is there on part of the principal to assist this teacher? AFAIK, according to this proposed law, NONE. It will be a chance for the principal to more easily fire someone whom they may simply not like, someone who may be a little different, etc.

Good quote from your hotel manager. So true.

 
At 1:47 AM , Blogger linda said...

Employees in general do not have First Amendment rights vis-a-vis their employers, because the First Amendment refers only to government action. Since schools are government agencies, teachers have more rights to speak on issues of public interest than employees of private enterprises, though not unlimited rights.

Similarly, most employees are at-will employees, unless the terms of their employment specifically provide otherwise. That means they can be fired for any or no reason at any time (although discrimination law limits the "any" part). Teachers have more protection against arbitrary termination, and more right to "due process," than other people, not less.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home